Sunday, December 16, 2012

SWOT




SWOT analysis (alternately SWOT Matrix) is a structured planning method used to evaluate the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats involved in a project or in a business venture. A SWOT analysis can be carried out for a product, place or person. It involves specifying the objective of the business venture or project and identifying the internal and external factors that are favourable and unfavourable to achieve that objective. 
Setting the objective should be done after the SWOT analysis has been performed. This would allow achievable goals or objectives to be set for the organization.
Strengths: characteristics of the business, or project team that give it an advantage over others
Weaknesses: are characteristics that place the team at a disadvantage relative to others
Opportunities: external chances to improve performance (e.g. make greater profits) in the environment
Threats: external elements in the environment that could cause trouble for the business or project
Identification of SWOTs is essential because subsequent steps in the process of planning for achievement of the selected objective may be derived from the SWOTs.
First, the decision makers have to determine whether the objective is attainable, given the SWOTs. If the objective is NOT attainable a different objective must be selected and the process repeated.
Users of SWOT analysis need to ask and answer questions that generate meaningful information for each category (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) in order to maximize the benefits of this evaluation and find their competitive advantage.

Saturday, December 15, 2012

Quiz 2

Just want to remind you that we will have a quiz on Monday. I want you to be ready just for 2 questions:
1- Explain Growth Model completely and draw the chart related to this theory,
2- Explain SWOT Model, draw the chart and give examples.

* As you may remember I told you that I will ask those who want extra points to pass the course to do an investigation. Now I want those students to find the SWOT of a big market, this can be IKEA, Migros, Mango, Zara and ...

Good luck

Monday, December 10, 2012

make-up

Although I told you to check the weblog for Monday's class I forgot to mention here that I am not going to come and I hope, you were lazy enough and you didn't attend the class too.
so see you on Monday, 17th of December. Don't forget the test! we will talk about the make-up on Monday.

Sunday, December 2, 2012

Growth Model





Greiner (1972, 1998) describes how companies go through a series of phases as they grow and develop.

Creativity

When companies form and enter the Creative Phase, they are typically driven by the creative force of the founder and the new products and services that create value for customers. Innovation is natural and people do whatever is needed to make things work.

Leadership crisis

Initially, the founder (or the startup team) is able to cope with the demands of leadership, but as the company grows, they are pulled more and more in different directions until they are unable to fulfil their duties.
The increasing complexities of the firm may lead to challenges to the leader's ability, who may originally be the inventor and developer of the company products and who may find management and leadership a difficult challenge.

Direction

The response to the leadership crisis is to get more professional in management, for example by hiring managers who have got more experience and education in the subject, typically at a larger firm.
Professional managers know more about planning and tactics and help out with strategic thinking and operation plans. Rather than rushing around doing what seems to be needed at the time, a longer-term view starts to emerge, giving direction and focus to proceedings.
This stage also includes separation of activities such as budgeting and marketing, although these are probably not yet done by a separate department.

Autonomy crisis

As professional managers start to direct the proceedings they typically have a greater interest in their own areas of interest than those of others or the overall firm. They seek personal success and will fight to achieve this. When they own all the resources they need, this is fine, but as the firm grows they fall into conflict with one another, arguing over resources and rewards.
The question hence arises of how to give managers and individuals the freedom to choose and succeed in a way that also helps the whole company.

Delegation

The response to the autonomy crisis is to divide and conquer with greater structure and deeper hierarchy, where individual departments and operational units have individual managers and are delegated greater autonomy.
This is the time when middle managers appear, running multiple operational units where they manage managers rather than give direct orders to the front line.

Control crisis

There are problems in delegation and in particular as it gets more complex in a growing firm, for example where the communicated requirements are not always understood, and where managers make autonomous decisions that, while they may make sense at their level are suboptimal for the overall organization.
Not knowing enough about what is really going on at the bottom of the organization, middle and senior managers at the end of this stage start to lose control over everyday operations.

Coordination

The response to the loss of control is to put additional effort into reporting up and communicating in all directions. Isolated business teams and product organizations are joined up in business units and other collective organizations.
Finance is still managed centrally and becomes more sophisticated, looking at such as business unit return on investment. Reporting becomes more sophisticated with increasing demands on business units for information about all aspects of the business.

Red tape crisis

This coordination does not come at a price and the increasing reporting and control adds layers of bureaucracy at all levels. Layers in the company face off against one another and perhaps play cat and mouse games of reports that looks good and audits that seek hidden problems.

Collaboration

The growing antagonism of cold coordination is addressed by attention to human connection and more collaborative, supportive approaches. Bureaucracy is simplified and trust is rebuilt with a greater focus on common organizational goals.
Structures may be implemented to connect people in multiple dimensions, such as the use of matrix management. Reward systems may also be realigned to promote team and organizational success rather than just individual performance.

Growth crisis

While a collaborative organization is better in many ways than previous forms, there are now problems in how to grow further without overloading current systems and processes.

Alliances

The final stage is to address the crisis of internal growth by looking externally. One approach is to pursue growth through mergers and acquisitions. Another way is to create a virtual super-organization by forming partnerships and alliances where the business value created can benefit everyone. A typical way this happens is where each partner contributes particular skills and competences to a total customer solution.
No doubt there are crises beyond this phase, but Greiner's model does not discuss them. Typical problems include a repetition of earlier phases, but on a grander scale. For example where communication between partners is weak, leading to more formal coordination. Mergers and Acquisitions are also subject to failure, often because of cultural and personal differences.

Discussion

Stage models have two ways of transitioning between stages. The change can be smooth or it can be punctuated by crisis and struggle. This is a crisis-based transition model. There is an implication in this where firms that do not successfully negotiate these crises will stagnate and possibly fail. The human development parallel is where a person becomes stuck and unable to fully develop to adulthood (this is the cause of many neuroses).
Within each phase, the organizational design is initially suitable for the company size and context. As growth continues, the design becomes unwieldy and the very factors that at first made it suitable now lead to a crisis that triggers the redesign and transition to the next phase. This pattern then repeats the cycle of initial appropriate design followed by increasing tensions as growth causes new problems.
This echoes a kind of storytelling pattern, whereby realistic stories are not linear narratives but have twist and turns in the plot. There is also a yin-yang cycle, where the solution for one crisis holds the seeds for the next crisis. There is even a parallel in political systems which cycle between stability and revolution.
A clear with evolution can be identified whereby the business evolves as it grows, adapting to the internal and external forces that it finds. Along the way, selection takes place as those that do not adapt, fail.

Sunday, November 4, 2012

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Quotes

Think too much 
and you will create a problem that was not there in the first place. 

Monday, October 15, 2012

Quiz 1


Happy Bayram to you all


the questions of today's quiz are as followed: 

1-      The dimensions of culture (8 points)
● write the right culture dimension for each term
 a) Work and ideas are shared by the members of the group
b) Decisions are made quickly and being spontaneous is important
c) Men and women have similar status and ideas
d) Staff can work without knowing all the details
e) Most employees do not have close contact with those who make decisions
f) Staff prefer to work on their own ideas and projects
g) Everyone can make suggestions and their ideas are listened to
h) Planning ahead is very important
2-      Will print newspapers extinct in near future?  (5 points)
3-      Please translate the paragraph below: (5 points)
In 2005 Facebook received $12.7 million in funding from Accel Partners and expanded to include high school networks and added a popular photo sharing features.
4-      Write an email to your supervisor and tell him that you are going to be on leave for the next week. ( 5 points)
5-      Decide which of the following factors are hygiene or motivation factors: (7 points)
● Rude colleagues
●promotion
● Low pay
● A job you enjoy
● An aggressive manager
● Only a few days of annual leave
● Responsibility
6-      Bonus points:
● Which country is the most democratic country in the world? (2 points)
● What is the name of the 20th century’s best book? Who wrote it? What is the origin language of the book? (3 points)  

*If you want to know about the results of this quiz please inform me by email. 
* any other question is welcomed. 

Sunday, October 14, 2012

Unit 3

Motivation

Herzberg carried out a motivation study on 200 accountants and engineers who worked in companies in the USA. these subjects of the study were asked two questions: 
1- When did you feel particularly good about your job? 
2- When did you feel exceptionally bad about your job? 
The responses that Herzberg obtained were interesting and fairly consistent. Reported good feelings were usually associated with job experiences and job content. 
One example of these was the head of an accounting department; he was given the job of installing new computer equipment. He took pride in his work and was pleased to know that the new equipment made a big difference in how his department functioned. Reported bad feelings on the other hand, were usually associated with the surrounding or peripheral aspects of the job - the job content. An example of these feelings was give by an engineer; his first job was routine record keeping and managing the office when the boss was gone. His boss was always too busy to train him and became annoyed when he tried to ask questions. The engineer said that he was frustrated in this job context and that he felt that he was just an unimportant assistant in a dead-end job. 
Herzberg concluded that job satisfiers are related to job content and that  job dissatisfies are related to job context.  Herzberg labelled that satisfiers 'motivators'  and he called the dissatisfies 'hygiene factors'.  

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Unit two




Dear all, 

After Monday's debates you can answer the following questions: 
1- Will print newspapers extinct in near future? 
2- Explain the effects of technologies in your daily life.
3- Explain the effects of technologies in your job.
4- Explain how Facebook could expand its activities.
5- Why Facebook is more successful that the other public networks? 
6- Which technology devises do you use in your job and how they can change the outcome of what you are doing? 

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Unit One ( easy version)

This article explains the culture dimensions in a more easy way. you can read this and if you have any questions please do not hesitate to ask me,


The five dimensions:

1-Power distance: Hierarchy is a feature of most human life, but in some cultures, the gap between those with a lot of power and those with little power is wider. This leads to a society where power is concentrated on a small number of people at the top who make most of the decisions, and there is less expectations of movement between classes or levels. In cultures where power distance is low, people tend to expect that those in power have earned it. They also expect power relations to be more democratic that those in a high power distance society.

2-Individualism/ collectivism: if people are from individualistic society they will see themselves as single independent actors, not as a group members at a deep level as people in collective societies do. It is also important to realize that this dimension does not show that some people like to be in groups: they are in groups because it is a matter of identity.

3-Uncertainly avoidance: in some cultures, people prefer to have everything presented in detail so there will be few, if any surprises. In cultures where uncertainly avoidance in low, people are more relaxed about the unknown and are not worried when they don’t have all the details.

4-Masculinity: in this dimension, there is a gender gap. Women’s values are said to be more similar across all cultures. Women are said to value kindness, building relationships and reaching agreements through communications. In culture with a low masculinity dimensions, men also share the values connected with women and there is more equality between men and women. However, cultures with a high masculinity dimensions have more values connected with men: competition, assertiveness and looking out for Number One. In such cultures, the values of women also move toward the masculinity end of the spectrum.

5-Long-term/short-term orientation: long-term planning, saving and hard work are valued in cultures with long-term orientation, whereas living for the moment is more important in those with short-term orientations.

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Unit One



Culture dimensions:
National cultures can be described according to the analysis of Geert Hofstede. These ideas were first based on a large research project into national culture differences across subsidiaries of a multinational corporation (IBM) in 64 countries. Subsequent studies by others covered students in 23 countries, elites in 19 countries, commercial airline pilots in 23 countries, up-market consumers in 15 countries, and civil service managers in 14 countries. Together these studies identified and validated four independent dimensions of national culture differences, with a fifth dimension added later.

Power distance
Hofstede’s Power distance Index measures the extent to which the less powerful members of organizations and institutions (like the family) accept and expect that power is distributed unequally. This represents inequality (more versus less), but defined from below, not from above. It suggests that a society’s level of inequality is endorsed by the followers as much as by the leaders.
For example, Germany has a 35 on the cultural scale of Hofstede’s analysis. Compared to Arab countries where the power distance is very high (80) and Austria where it very low (11), Germany is somewhat in the middle. Germany does not have a large gap between the wealthy and the poor, but have a strong belief in equality for each citizen. Germans have the opportunity to rise in society.
On the other hand, the power distance in the United States scores a 40 on the cultural scale. The United States exhibits a more unequal distribution of wealth compared to German society. As the years go by it seems that the distance between the ‘have’ and ‘have-nots’ grows larger and larger.
Power distance in Turkey is: 66

Individualism
Individualism is the one side versus its opposite, collectivism, that is the degree to which individuals are integrated into groups. On the individualist side we find societies in which the ties between individuals are loose: everyone is expected to look after him/herself and his/her immediate family. On the collectivist side, we find societies in which people from birth onwards are integrated into strong, cohesive in-groups, often extended families (with uncles, aunts and grandparents) which continue protecting them in exchange for unquestioning loyalty.
For example, Germany can be considered as individualistic with a relatively high score (67) on the scale of Hofstede compared to a country like Guatemala where they have strong collectivism (6 on the scale).
In Germany people stress on personal achievements and individual rights. Germans expect from each other to fulfil their own needs. Group work is important, but everybody has the right of his own opinion and is expected to reflect those. In an individual country like Germany people tend to have more loose relationships than countries where there is collectivism where people have large extended families.
The United States can clearly been seen as individualistic (scoring a 91). The “American dream” is clearly a representation of this. This is the Americans’ hope for a better quality of life and a higher standard of living than their parents’. This belief is that anyone, regardless of their status can ‘pull up their boot straps’ and raise themselves from poverty.
Turkey: 37

Masculinity
Masculinity versus its opposite, femininity refers to the distribution of roles between the genders which is another fundamental issue for any society to which a range of solutions are found. The IBM studies revealed that (a) women’s values differ less among societies than men’s values; (b) men’s values from one country to another contain a dimension from very assertive and competitive and maximally different from women’s values on the one side, to modest and caring and similar to women’s values on the other. The assertive pole has been called ‘masculine’ and the modest, caring pole ‘feminine’.
For example, Germany has a masculine culture with a 66 on the scale of Hofstede (Netherlands 14). Masculine traits include assertiveness, materialism/material success, self-centeredness, power, strength, and individual achievements. The United States scored a 62 on Hofstede’s scale. So these two cultures share, in terms of masculinity, similar values.

Uncertainty Avoidance
Uncertainty avoidance deals with a society’s tolerance for uncertainty and ambiguity; it ultimately refers to man’s search for Truth. It indicates to what extent a culture programs its members to feel either uncomfortable or comfortable in unstructured situations. Unstructured situations are novel, unknown, surprising, and different from usual. Uncertainty avoiding cultures try to minimize the possibility of such situations by strict laws and rules, safety and security measures, and on the philosophical and religious level by a belief in absolute Truth; ‘there can only be one Truth and we have it’.
For example, in Germany there is a reasonable high uncertainty avoidance (65) compared to countries as Singapore (8) and neighbouring country Denmark (23). Germans are not to keen on uncertainty, by planning everything carefully they try to avoid the uncertainty. In Germany there is a society that relies on rules, laws and regulations. Germany wants to reduce its risks to the minimum and proceed with changes step by step.
The United States scores a 46 compared to the 65 of the German culture. Uncertainty avoidance in the US is relatively low, which can clearly be viewed through the national cultures.
Turkey: 85

Long-Term Orientation
Long-Term Orientation is the fifth dimension of Hofstede which was added after the original four to try to distinguish the difference in thinking between the East and West. From the original IBM studies, this difference was something that could not be deduced. Therefore, Hofstede created a Chinese value survey which was distributed across 23 countries. From these results, and with an understanding of the influence of the teaching of Confucius on the East, long term vs. short term orientation became the fifth cultural dimension.
Below are some characteristics of the two opposing sides of this dimension:
Long term orientation
-persistence
-ordering relationships by status and observing this order
-thrift
-having a sense of shame
Short term orientation
-personal steadiness and stability
-protecting your ‘face’
-respect or tradition
-reciprocation of greetings, favors, and gifts

you can also watch this, it may help